Technical Annual Status Report (Stage I) of CLRTAP Inventory Review for Portugal

Generated by CEIP: 30 th March 2022

This status report was prepared by the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP). The Status Report provides information based on the initial checks of the CLRTAP inventories submitted in accordance with the reporting requirements of the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) and its protocols.


Review Process

The technical review of national inventories involves the checking and assessment of national data submissions with a view to improving the quality of emission data and associated information.

The annual review process is carried out in three stages in accordance with the review guidelines developed by the Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections (TFEIP) and as agreed upon by EMEP and the Executive Body of CLRTAP in 2007: Methods and procedures for the technical review of air pollutant emission inventories reported under the Convention and its protocols ( ECE/EB.AIR/GE.1/2007/16 ).

§ Stage 1: An initial check of submissions for timeliness and completeness;

§ Stage 2: A synthesis and assessment of all national submissions with respect to consistency and comparability of data with recommendations for data quality improvement;

§ Stage 3: In-depth reviews of selected inventories, by pollutant, country or sector, as in the workplan agreed by the Executive Body.

If you have any comments concerning the results of the tests in this report, please contact the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) by email at ‘emep.emissions@umweltbundesamt.at
within two weeks of your receiving this Status Report.


STAGE I REVIEW TESTS

This Stage 1 Status Report documents assesses the timeliness, completeness, and format of the submitted national inventories. It presents results of these initial automated tests to countries and supports the subsequent Stage II and Stage III review process. Stage I tests are:

§ 1a Timeliness

§ 1b Format of submission

§ 1c Completeness per sector for 2020 emissions

§ 1d Completeness per pollutant of your data in the WebDab database

Data included in tests:

§ Emissions reported under the Convention on LRTAP.


1a TIMELINESS

Date of submission of CLRTAP : 15.02.2022 , received within deadline 15.02.2022

Date of resubmission of CLRTAP : 15.03.2022 , received within deadline 15.03.2022


1b FORMAT OF SUBMISSION

Parties are invited to check consistency of the format via RepDab (http://www.ceip.at/repdab_howtouse) before the submission of their inventory to the UNECE secretariat, the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and/or the European Commission/European Environment Agency. This section indicates whether the data submitted were in the Nomenclature for Reporting and the files were formatted as requested in the Guidelines for Estimating and Reporting Emission data. The current standard format for reporting is NFR19. Reporting templates can be downloaded from the CEIP website (http://www.ceip.at/reporting_instructions/annexes_to_guidelines).

CLRTAP inventory submitted in format: NFR19 (Version 2019-1) for the years 1990 to 2020


1c COMPLETENESS PER SECTOR (YEAR 2020)

The tables below lists all sectors where 'Not Estimated (NE)' notation keys were reported for the year 2020. At the end of the table is a statistic of how many notation keys in general were reported per pollutant and a count of not estimated sectors per pollutant. If nothing at all is reported for a certain pollutant which is listed in the tables this is also indicated.


CLRTAP (Completeness per sector for 2020):

SectorNOxNMVOCSOxNH3PM2.5PM10TSPBCCOPbCdHgAsCrCuNiSeZnDIOXPAHHCBPCB
                       
1A1b   NE                  
1A2a   NE                  
1A2gvii                     NE
1A3ai(i)   NE                  
1A3aii(i)   NE                  
1A3bv                 NENENE NE
1A3bvi        NE  NE      NE  NE
1A3bvii        NENENENENENENENENE NENE NE
1A3dii                  NE   
1A4aii   NE       NENE     NE NENE
1A4bii           NENE     NE NENE
1A4cii           NENE     NE NENE
1A4ciii   NE               NE  
1A5b       NE          NENE  
1B1a   NE    NENENENENENENENENE NENE  
1B1bNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE NENE  
1B1cNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE    
1B2av  NE              NE    
1B2b  NE               NE   
1B2c   NE   NE        NE NE   
1B2dNENENE NENENENENENENE  NENENENENENENENENE
2A1                  NENE  
2A2NENENE     NENENENE          
2A3           NE  NE  NENENE  
2B1 NENE NE                 
2B10a         NENENENENENENENENENENENENE
2B2    NE                 
2B7    NENENE               
2C1   NE            NE   NE 
2C2NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE  
2C3NENENENE    NENENENENENENENENENE NENE 
2C5NENE NE   NENE  NE NENENENE  NENE 
2C7aNENE NE                  
2D3a    NE                 
2D3bNE NE              NENENE  
2D3cNE        NENENE      NENENE 
2D3e    NE                 
2D3f    NE                 
2D3gNE NE    NENENE NE  NE  NENE NENE
2D3h    NE  NE              
2D3iNE NENE   NENENENENENENENENENENE  NENE
2G                    NENE
2H1   NE   NE           NE  
2H2    NE NENE              
2INENENENENENE NENE   NE NE       
2K         NENE NENENENENENE  NE 
5B1NENENE NENENENENE             
5B2NENENE NENENENENENENENE NE    NENENENE
5C1bi   NE          NE NENE    
5C1bii   NE          NE NENE    
5C1biii                NENE    
5C1biv   NE          NE NENE    
5C1bv       NE              
5D1    NENENENE NENENE NE   NENENENENE
5D2   NENENENENE NENE           
5ENENENE                 NENE
                       
11B         NENENENENENENENENENENE  
1A3ai(ii)    NENENENE              
1A3aii(ii)    NENENENE              
1A3di(i)                  NE   
                       
60 of 135 Sectors listed                      
Count of overall notation keys7763938968676794959493999695979510099106102118114
Count of 'NE' notation keys16131622191212201517162014141812181824191615


1d COMPLETENESS PER POLLUTANT (entire time series)

The completeness of your data in the WebDab database has been evaluated on the basis of the criteria outlined in the 2014 Guidelines for Reporting Emission Data and Projections under the CLRTAP (ECE/EB.AIR/125):

All numbers in table are as a percentage of the total number of reporting template cells per component and time series. Flagging occurs when the number of cells containing a value or a notation key is less than 80% of the total number of cells, if there are more than 10% zeroes reported, if 'Not Estimated' is reported in cells and/or if the number of values reported is less than 10%. The completeness of CLRTAP NFR Sectors is divided in two sections: 1990 to 1999 and 2000 to 2020.


CLRTAP (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 2000 to 2020 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx42.60.017.412.621.06.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC53.20.017.29.713.06.00.00.0100.0
SOx30.30.017.212.634.26.00.00.0100.0
NH334.10.020.018.124.03.20.00.0100.0
PM2.551.50.017.912.911.06.00.00.0100.0
PM1052.50.017.97.616.06.00.00.0100.0
TSP52.50.017.97.616.06.00.00.0100.0
BC31.10.019.213.730.26.00.00.0100.0
CO28.70.017.912.834.66.00.00.0100.0
Pb30.90.017.212.634.26.00.00.0100.0
Cd31.10.017.211.634.26.00.00.0100.0
Hg27.70.017.914.934.26.00.00.0100.0
As29.60.017.69.937.06.00.00.0100.0
Cr30.00.017.510.436.26.00.00.0100.0
Cu28.40.017.212.937.04.00.00.0100.0
Ni30.00.018.28.938.06.00.00.0100.0
Se26.00.018.213.938.04.00.00.0100.0
Zn27.30.018.513.536.94.00.00.0100.0
DIOX24.10.017.916.636.25.00.00.0100.0
PAH26.00.018.514.436.25.00.00.0100.0
HCB14.10.017.212.552.24.00.00.0100.0
PCB17.10.017.211.450.24.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


CLRTAP (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 1990 to 1999 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx43.00.017.011.422.06.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC54.00.017.09.013.06.00.00.0100.0
SOx31.00.017.011.035.06.00.00.0100.0
NH332.70.020.017.824.44.10.00.0100.0
CO30.00.018.012.034.06.00.00.0100.0
Pb31.00.017.411.035.06.00.00.0100.0
Cd31.60.017.410.035.06.00.00.0100.0
Hg28.50.018.412.835.06.10.00.0100.0
As30.60.017.48.937.06.10.00.0100.0
Cr30.60.018.49.037.06.00.00.0100.0
Cu29.50.017.412.137.04.00.00.0100.0
Ni30.60.018.48.038.06.00.00.0100.0
Se27.60.018.413.038.04.00.00.0100.0
Zn28.00.019.413.036.04.00.00.0100.0
DIOX25.00.018.014.837.05.10.00.0100.0
PAH26.60.019.413.037.05.00.00.0100.0
HCB15.00.018.59.952.54.20.00.0100.0
PCB17.00.018.59.950.54.20.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


CLRTAP (Completeness of National Totals from 1990 to 2020 including NFR and SNAP):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
SOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NH3100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PM2.5100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PM10100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
TSP100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
BC100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
CO100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Pb100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Cd100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Hg100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
As100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Cr100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Cu100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Ni100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Se100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Zn100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
DIOX100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PAH100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
HCB100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PCB100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences