Generated by CEIP: 30 th March 2022
This status report was prepared by the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP). The Status Report provides information based on the initial checks of the CLRTAP inventories submitted in accordance with the reporting requirements of the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) and its protocols.
The technical review of national inventories involves the checking and assessment of national data submissions with a view to improving the quality of emission data and associated information.
The annual review process is carried out in three stages in accordance with the review guidelines developed by the Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections (TFEIP) and as agreed upon by EMEP and the Executive Body of CLRTAP in 2007: Methods and procedures for the technical review of air pollutant emission inventories reported under the Convention and its protocols ( ECE/EB.AIR/GE.1/2007/16 ).
§ Stage 1: An initial check of submissions for timeliness and completeness;
§ Stage 2: A synthesis and assessment of all national submissions with respect to consistency and comparability of data with recommendations for data quality improvement;
§ Stage 3: In-depth reviews of selected inventories, by pollutant, country or sector, as in the workplan agreed by the Executive Body.
If you have any comments concerning the results of the tests in this report, please contact the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) by email at ‘emep.emissions@umweltbundesamt.at’
within two weeks of your receiving this Status Report.
STAGE I REVIEW TESTS
This Stage 1 Status Report documents assesses the timeliness, completeness, and format of the submitted national inventories. It presents results of these initial automated tests to countries and supports the subsequent Stage II and Stage III review process. Stage I tests are:
§ 1a Timeliness
§ 1b Format of submission
§ 1c Completeness per sector for 2020 emissions
§ 1d Completeness per pollutant of your data in the WebDab database
Data included in tests:
§ Emissions reported under the Convention on LRTAP.
Date of submission of CLRTAP : 09.02.2022 , received within deadline 15.02.2022
Parties are invited to check consistency of the format via RepDab (http://www.ceip.at/repdab_howtouse) before the submission of their inventory to the UNECE secretariat, the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and/or the European Commission/European Environment Agency. This section indicates whether the data submitted were in the Nomenclature for Reporting and the files were formatted as requested in the Guidelines for Estimating and Reporting Emission data. The current standard format for reporting is NFR19. Reporting templates can be downloaded from the CEIP website (http://www.ceip.at/reporting_instructions/annexes_to_guidelines).
CLRTAP inventory submitted in format: NFR19 (Version 2019-1) for the years 1990 to 2020
The tables below lists all sectors where 'Not Estimated (NE)' notation keys were reported for the year 2020. At the end of the table is a statistic of how many notation keys in general were reported per pollutant and a count of not estimated sectors per pollutant. If nothing at all is reported for a certain pollutant which is listed in the tables this is also indicated.
Sector NOx NMVOC SOx NH3 PM2.5 PM10 TSP BC CO Pb Cd Hg As Cr Cu Ni Se Zn DIOX PAH HCB PCB 1A1a NE 1A1b NE 1A1c NE 1A2a NE 1A2b NE 1A2c NE 1A2d NE 1A2e NE 1A2f NE 1A2gvii NE 1A2gviii NE 1A3ai(i) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3aii(i) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3bi NE 1A3bii NE 1A3biii NE 1A3biv NE 1A3bv NE NE 1A3bvi NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3bvii NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3c NE NE NE NE 1A3di(ii) NE 1A3dii NE NE NE 1A3ei NE NE 1A3eii NE 1A4ai NE 1A4aii NE 1A4bi NE 1A4bii NE 1A4ci NE 1A4cii NE NE 1A4ciii NE NE NE 1A5a NE 1A5b NE 1B1a NE 1B1b NE 1B1c NE 1B2ai NE 1B2aiv NE 1B2av NE 1B2b NE 1B2c NE 1B2d NE 2A1 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2A2 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2A3 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2A5a NE 2A5b NE 2A5c NE NE NE NE 2A6 NE 2B1 NE NE NE NE 2B10a NE 2B10b NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2B2 NE NE NE 2B3 NE 2B5 NE 2B6 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2B7 NE NE NE NE 2C1 NE NE 2C2 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2C3 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2C4 NE 2C5 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2C6 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2C7a NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2C7b NE 2C7c NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2C7d NE NE NE NE 2D3a NE 2D3b NE 2D3c NE 2D3d NE 2D3e NE 2D3f NE 2D3g NE 2D3h NE 2D3i NE 2G NE NE NE 2H1 NE NE NE NE 2H2 NE NE NE NE NE 2H3 NE 2I NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2J NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2K NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2L NE 3B1a NE 3B1b NE 3B2 NE 3B3 NE 3B4a NE 3B4d NE 3B4e NE 3B4f NE 3B4gi NE 3B4gii NE 3B4giii NE 3B4giv NE 3B4h NE 3Da1 NE 3Da2a NE 3Da2b NE 3Da2c NE 3Da3 NE 3Da4 NE 3Db NE 3Dc NE 3Dd NE 3De NE 3Df NE 3F NE NE NE 3I NE 5A NE NE NE NE 5B1 NE 5B2 NE 5C1a NE 5C1bi NE NE NE NE NE 5C1bii NE 5C1biii NE NE NE NE NE 5C1biv NE NE NE NE NE 5C1bv NE NE 5C1bvi NE 5C2 NE NE NE NE NE 5D1 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 5D2 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 5D3 NE 5E NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 6A NE 11A NE 11B NE 11C NE 1A3ai(ii) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3aii(ii) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3di(i) NE NE 1A5c NE 6B NE 135 of 135 Sectors listed Count of overall notation keys 75 62 90 93 64 64 59 86 91 98 94 99 98 100 101 99 135 102 96 103 107 106 Count of 'NE' notation keys 13 15 11 26 13 11 7 13 14 14 13 18 15 17 19 16 135 17 9 17 17 10
The completeness of your data in the WebDab database has been evaluated on the basis of the criteria outlined in the 2014 Guidelines for Reporting Emission Data and Projections under the CLRTAP (ECE/EB.AIR/125):
All numbers in table are as a percentage of the total number of reporting template cells per component and time series. Flagging occurs when the number of cells containing a value or a notation key is less than 80% of the total number of cells, if there are more than 10% zeroes reported, if 'Not Estimated' is reported in cells and/or if the number of values reported is less than 10%. The completeness of CLRTAP NFR Sectors is divided in two sections: 1990 to 1999 and 2000 to 2020.
Component % Value % 0 % NO % NE % NA % IE % C % NR % All NOx 44.4 0.0 6.0 9.6 34.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NMVOC 53.9 0.0 6.0 12.0 23.1 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 SOx 33.4 0.0 6.0 8.6 46.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NH3 31.4 0.0 6.5 20.0 36.2 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM2.5 53.0 0.0 6.0 10.0 25.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM10 53.0 0.0 6.0 9.0 27.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 TSP 57.0 0.0 6.0 6.0 26.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 BC 35.0 0.0 6.0 10.0 43.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 CO 32.4 0.0 6.0 10.6 45.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Pb 28.9 0.0 6.0 9.0 49.1 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cd 31.4 0.0 6.0 9.6 46.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Hg 28.0 0.0 6.0 13.0 47.6 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 As 28.0 0.0 6.0 10.0 49.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cr 27.0 0.0 6.0 12.0 49.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cu 26.0 0.0 6.0 13.0 49.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Ni 28.0 0.0 6.0 10.6 49.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Se 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Zn 26.4 0.0 6.0 11.6 50.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 DIOX 29.4 0.0 6.0 6.6 53.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PAH 24.4 0.0 6.0 13.0 50.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 HCB 20.6 0.0 6.0 13.0 56.4 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PCB 22.0 0.0 6.0 8.0 61.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences
Component % Value % 0 % NO % NE % NA % IE % C % NR % All NOx 43.8 0.0 6.8 9.4 34.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NMVOC 51.3 0.0 7.3 12.4 24.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 SOx 32.3 0.0 7.3 8.4 46.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NH3 30.1 0.0 8.0 20.0 36.7 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 CO 31.8 0.0 6.8 10.4 45.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Pb 28.0 0.0 7.3 9.0 49.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cd 31.0 0.0 7.3 9.0 46.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Hg 27.7 0.0 7.3 13.0 47.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 As 27.7 0.0 7.3 10.0 49.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cr 25.7 0.0 7.3 12.0 49.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cu 24.7 0.0 7.3 13.0 49.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Ni 27.7 0.0 7.3 10.0 49.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Se 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Zn 25.7 0.0 7.3 11.0 50.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 DIOX 28.7 0.0 7.3 6.0 53.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PAH 24.0 0.0 7.3 13.0 50.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 HCB 20.5 0.0 6.3 13.0 56.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PCB 20.7 0.0 6.3 8.0 61.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences
Component % Value % 0 % NO % NE % NA % IE % C % NR % All NOx 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NMVOC 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 SOx 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NH3 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM2.5 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM10 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 TSP 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 BC 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 CO 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Pb 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cd 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Hg 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 As 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cr 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cu 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Ni 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Se 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Zn 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 DIOX 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PAH 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 HCB 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PCB 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences