Technical Annual Status Report (Stage I) of CLRTAP and NECD Inventory Review for the Netherlands

Generated by CEIP: 22 nd March 2013

This status report was prepared by the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and European Topic Centre on Air and Climate Change (ETC/ACC). The Status Report provides information based on the initial checks of the CLRTAP and NECD inventories submitted in accordance with the reporting requirements of the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) and its protocols, and for EU Member States the Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants (NECD).


Review Process

The technical review of national inventories involves the checking and assessment of national data submissions with a view to improving the quality of emission data and associated information.

The annual review process is carried out in three stages in accordance with the review guidelines developed by the Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections (TFEIP) and as agreed upon by EMEP and the Executive Body of CLRTAP in 2007: Methods and procedures for the technical review of air pollutant emission inventories reported under the Convention and its protocols ( ECE/EB.AIR/GE.1/2007/16 ).

§ Stage 1: An initial check of submissions for timeliness and completeness;

§ Stage 2: A synthesis and assessment of all national submissions with respect to consistency and comparability of data with recommendations for data quality improvement;

§ Stage 3: In-depth reviews of selected inventories, by pollutant, country or sector, as in the workplan agreed by the Executive Body.

If you have any comments concerning the results of the tests in this report, please contact the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) by email at ‘emep.emissions@umweltbundesamt.at
within two weeks of your receiving this Status Report.


STAGE I REVIEW TESTS

This Stage 1 Status Report documents assesses the timeliness, completeness, and format of the submitted national inventories. It presents results of these initial automated tests to countries and supports the subsequent Stage II and Stage III review process. Stage I tests are:

§ 1a Timeliness

§ 1b Format of submission

§ 1c Completeness per sector for 2011 emissions

§ 1d Completeness per pollutant of your data in the WebDab database

Data included in tests:

§ Emissions reported under the Convention on LRTAP.

§ Emissions reported under the NECD Directive to the European Commission and European Environment Agency.


1a TIMELINESS

Date of submission of NECD : 21.12.2012 , received within deadline 31.12.2012

Date of submission of CLRTAP : 15.2.2013 , received within deadline 15.02.2013

Informative Inventory Report (IIR): Received


1b FORMAT OF SUBMISSION

Parties are invited to check consistency of the format via RepDab ( http://www.ceip.at/repdab-check-your-inventory/ ) before the submission of their inventory to the UNECE secretariat, the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and/or the European Commission/European Environment Agency. This section indicates whether the data submitted were in the Nomenclature for Reporting (NFR or Flat-file) and the files were formatted as requested in the Guidelines for Estimating and Reporting Emission data.

NECD inventory submitted in format: NFR09 (Version 2009-1) for the years 2010 and 2011; Projections for 2020 and 2030

CLRTAP inventory submitted in format: NFR09 (Version 2009-1) for the years 1990 to 2011; Projections for 2020 and 2030


1c COMPLETENESS PER SECTOR (YEAR 2011)

NE in the tables below shows for which sectors you have reported 'Not Estimated' in the 2011 emission data (also the associated sectors are coloured). Sectors where you have reported only notation keys are listed as well, but without colouring. There are only priority pollutants included in this analysis. At the end of the table you can see a statistic of how many sectors are listed and the number of reported 'NE' notation keys per pollutant. For NECD you can see the sector completeness not only for 2011, but also for 2010 emission data.


CLRTAP (Completeness per sector for 2011):

SectorNOxNMVOCSOxNH3PM2.5PM10TSPCOPbCdHgDIOXPAHHCBHCHPCB
                 
1 A 2 f ii        NANENA  NANANA
1 A 3 a ii (i)IEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIENAIEIENANANA
1 A 3 b viiNANANANA   NANANENANANANANANA
1 A 3 c         NENA  NONANO
1 A 3 d i (ii)        NANENA  NONANO
1 A 3 d ii        NANENA  NANANO
1 A 3 eIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIENONONO
1 A 4 a ii        NANENE  NANANA
1 A 4 b ii        NENENE  NANANA
1 A 4 c ii        NONENE  NANANA
1 A 4 c iii        NANENA  NANANA
1 A 5 b   NA     NENANA NANANA
1 B 1 aNANONONAIEIEIENANONONONANANANANA
1 B 1 bNONONONONONONONONONONONANONANANA
1 B 1 cNONONONONONONONONONONONONANANANA
1 B 2 a vNANONONANANANANANANANANONANANANA
1 B 2 cNAIENONAIEIEIEIENONONONONONANANA
1 B 3NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
2 A 2IEIEIENANONONONONONONONANANANANO
2 A 3NANANANANONONONANANANANANANANANA
2 A 4NANANANANONONONANANANANANANANANA
2 A 5NAIENANANONONONONONONONONONONANA
2 A 6IEIEIENANONONONONANANANONONONANA
2 A 7 aNANANANANONONONANANANANANANANANA
2 A 7 bNANANANANONONONANANANANANANANANA
2 A 7 cNANANANANONONONANANANANANANANANA
2 B 1NOIENOIENONONONONANANANANANANANA
2 B 2NENANAIENONONONANANANANANANANANA
2 B 3NONANANANONONONONANANANANANANANA
2 B 4NOIENONANONONONONONONONONONONANA
2 B 5 bNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
2 C 2IEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIENONANA
2 C 5 cNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONANO
2 C 5 fIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIENONONO
2 D 3NONONONONONONONONANANANANANANANA
2 ENONONONONONONONONANANANANANONONO
2 FNANANANANANANANANONONONANANONONO
3 A 3NANONANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
3 CNOIENONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
4 B 1 a NENA    NANANANANANANANANA
4 B 1 b NENA    NANANANANANANANANA
4 B 13 NENA    NANANANANANANANANA
4 B 2NENENANENENENENANANANANANANANANA
4 B 3IENENA NENENENANANANANANANANANA
4 B 4 NENA    NANANANANANANANANA
4 B 6 NENA    NANANANANANANANANA
4 B 7NENENANENENENENANANANANANANANANA
4 B 8 NENA    NANANANANANANANANA
4 B 9 a NENA    NANANANANANANANANA
4 B 9 b NENA    NANANANANANANANANA
4 B 9 cIENENAIEIEIEIENANANANANANANANANA
4 B 9 dIENENAIEIEIEIENANANANANANANANANA
4 D 2 bNANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
4 D 2 cIENANAIENANANANANANANANANANANANA
4 FNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
6 AIE IENEIEIEIEIENANANANAIENANANA
6 BIEIEIENEIEIEIEIENANANANAIENANANA
6 C aNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
6 C bNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
6 C cIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIENANA
6 C dIENEIEIE   IENENE  NENENANA
6 C eNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONANO
                 
1 A 3   NE     NENENENENENENE
1 A 3 a i (ii)NENENENENENENENENENENENENENANANA
1 A 3 a ii (ii)NENENENENENENENENENENENENENANANA
11 ANONONONONONONONONONONONONONONANA
11 BNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONANA
7 BNONONONONONONONONONONONONONANANA
                 
68 of 117 NFR09 Sectors listed                
Count of 'NE' sectors per pollutant516275552414634211


NECD (Completeness per sector for 2011 and 2010):

2011

SectorNOxNMVOCSOxNH3
     
1 A 3 a ii (i)IEIEIEIE
1 A 3 b viNANANANA
1 A 3 b viiNANANANA
1 A 3 eIEIEIEIE
1 B 1 aNANONONA
1 B 1 bNONONONO
1 B 1 cNONONONO
1 B 2 a vNANONONA
1 B 2 cNAIENONA
1 B 3NONONONO
2 A 2IEIEIENA
2 A 3NANANANA
2 A 4NANANANA
2 A 5NAIENANA
2 A 6IEIEIENA
2 A 7 aNANANANA
2 A 7 bNANANANA
2 A 7 cNANANANA
2 B 1NOIENOIE
2 B 2NENANAIE
2 B 3NONANANA
2 B 4NOIENONA
2 B 5 bNONONONO
2 C 2IEIEIEIE
2 C 5 aNONONONO
2 C 5 cNONONONO
2 C 5 fIEIEIEIE
2 D 3NONONONO
2 ENONONONO
2 FNANANANA
3 A 3NANONANA
3 CNOIENONO
4 B 2NENONANE
4 B 7NENONANE
4 B 9 cIENONAIE
4 B 9 dIENONAIE
4 D 2 aNANANANA
4 D 2 bNANANANA
4 D 2 cNONANAIE
4 FNONONONO
6 ANA NANE
6 BNANENANE
6 C aNONONONO
6 C bNONONONO
6 C cIEIEIEIE
6 C dNENENENE
6 C eNONONONO
     
1 A 3   NE
1 A 3 a i (ii)NENENENE
1 A 3 a ii (ii)NENENENE
11 ANONONONO
11 BNONONONO
7 BNONONONO
     
53 of 117 NFR09 Sectors listed    
Count of 'NE' sectors per pollutant6438

2010

SectorNOxNMVOCSOxNH3
     
1 A 3 a ii (i)IEIEIEIE
1 A 3 b viNANANANA
1 A 3 b viiNANANANA
1 A 3 eIEIEIEIE
1 B 1 aNANONONA
1 B 1 bNONONONO
1 B 1 cNONONONO
1 B 2 a vNANONONA
1 B 2 cNAIENONA
1 B 3NONONONO
2 A 2IEIEIENA
2 A 3NANANANA
2 A 4NANANANA
2 A 5NAIENANA
2 A 6IEIEIENA
2 A 7 aNANANANA
2 A 7 bNANANANA
2 A 7 cNANANANA
2 B 1NOIENOIE
2 B 2NENANAIE
2 B 3NONANANA
2 B 4NOIENONA
2 B 5 bNONONONO
2 C 2IEIEIEIE
2 C 5 aNONONONO
2 C 5 cNONONONO
2 C 5 fIEIEIEIE
2 D 3NONONONO
2 ENONONONO
2 FNANANANA
3 A 3NANONANA
3 CNOIENONO
4 B 2NENONANE
4 B 7NENONANE
4 B 9 cIENONAIE
4 B 9 dIENONAIE
4 D 2 aNANANANA
4 D 2 bNANANANA
4 D 2 cNONANAIE
4 FNONONONO
6 ANA NANE
6 BNANENANE
6 C aNONONONO
6 C bNONONONO
6 C cIEIEIEIE
6 C dNENENENE
6 C eNONONONO
     
1 A 3   NE
1 A 3 a i (ii)NENENENE
1 A 3 a ii (ii)NENENENE
11 ANONONONO
11 BNONONONO
7 BNONONONO
     
53 of 117 NFR09 Sectors listed    
Count of 'NE' sectors per pollutant6438


1d COMPLETENESS PER POLLUTANT (entire time series)

The completeness of your data in the WebDab database of priority pollutants has been evaluated on the basis of the criteria outlined in 2009 Guidelines for Estimating and Reporting Emission Data under CLRTAP (ECE/EB.AIR/97):

All numbers in table are as a percentage of the total number of reporting template cells per component and time series. Flagging occurs when the number of cells containing a value or a notation key is less than 80% of the total number of cells, if there are more than 10% zeroes reported, if 'Not Estimated' is reported in cells and/or if the number of values reported is less than 10%. The completeness of CLRTAP NFR Sectors is divided in three sections: 1980 to 1989, 1990 to 1999 and 2000 to 2011.


CLRTAP (Completeness of National Totals from 1980 to 2011 including NFR and SNAP):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
SOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NH3100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PM2.5100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PM10100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
TSP100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
CO100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Pb100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Cd100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Hg100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
DIOX100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PAH100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
HCB100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
HCH0.00.0100.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PCB22.70.077.30.00.00.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


CLRTAP (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 1980 to 1989 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
NMVOC0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
SOx0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
NH30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
CO0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


CLRTAP (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 1990 to 1999 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx34.80.424.84.022.013.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC44.20.018.814.012.011.00.00.0100.0
SOx27.60.429.82.032.09.00.00.0100.0
NH334.50.023.26.027.09.00.00.0100.0
CO28.10.027.92.034.08.00.00.0100.0
Pb24.60.323.53.043.84.00.00.0100.0
Cd21.50.223.412.038.84.00.00.0100.0
Hg15.90.126.05.049.83.00.00.0100.0
DIOX22.11.328.53.041.04.00.00.0100.0
PAH33.90.020.13.036.16.00.00.0100.0
HCB1.00.033.02.064.01.00.00.0100.0
HCH0.00.013.01.086.00.00.00.0100.0
PCB0.30.034.81.064.00.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


CLRTAP (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 2000 to 2011 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx34.40.025.74.022.013.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC45.90.117.014.012.011.00.00.0100.0
SOx28.00.029.52.032.09.00.00.0100.0
NH335.90.021.96.026.89.00.00.0100.0
PM2.544.90.030.54.010.69.00.00.0100.0
PM1045.10.030.34.010.69.00.00.0100.0
TSP45.80.030.24.010.09.00.00.0100.0
CO28.60.027.42.034.08.00.00.0100.0
Pb21.90.026.53.044.04.00.00.0100.0
Cd18.50.326.112.039.04.00.00.0100.0
Hg13.70.327.75.050.03.00.00.0100.0
DIOX21.22.429.33.040.94.00.00.0100.0
PAH28.90.023.33.038.36.00.00.0100.0
HCB1.00.033.02.064.01.00.00.0100.0
HCH0.00.013.01.086.00.00.00.0100.0
PCB0.20.034.81.064.00.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences



-------------

NECD (Completeness of National Totals from 2001 to 2011 including NFR and SNAP):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
SOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NH3100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


NECD (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 2001 to 2011 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx31.60.027.25.022.314.10.00.0100.0
NMVOC46.40.031.12.211.09.20.00.0100.0
SOx29.30.029.53.032.45.90.00.0100.0
NH335.90.024.76.225.18.20.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences