Generated by CEIP: 30 th March 2022
This status report was prepared by the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP). The Status Report provides information based on the initial checks of the CLRTAP inventories submitted in accordance with the reporting requirements of the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) and its protocols.
The technical review of national inventories involves the checking and assessment of national data submissions with a view to improving the quality of emission data and associated information.
The annual review process is carried out in three stages in accordance with the review guidelines developed by the Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections (TFEIP) and as agreed upon by EMEP and the Executive Body of CLRTAP in 2007: Methods and procedures for the technical review of air pollutant emission inventories reported under the Convention and its protocols ( ECE/EB.AIR/GE.1/2007/16 ).
§ Stage 1: An initial check of submissions for timeliness and completeness;
§ Stage 2: A synthesis and assessment of all national submissions with respect to consistency and comparability of data with recommendations for data quality improvement;
§ Stage 3: In-depth reviews of selected inventories, by pollutant, country or sector, as in the workplan agreed by the Executive Body.
If you have any comments concerning the results of the tests in this report, please contact the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) by email at ‘emep.emissions@umweltbundesamt.at’
within two weeks of your receiving this Status Report.
STAGE I REVIEW TESTS
This Stage 1 Status Report documents assesses the timeliness, completeness, and format of the submitted national inventories. It presents results of these initial automated tests to countries and supports the subsequent Stage II and Stage III review process. Stage I tests are:
§ 1a Timeliness
§ 1b Format of submission
§ 1c Completeness per sector for 2020 emissions
§ 1d Completeness per pollutant of your data in the WebDab database
Data included in tests:
§ Emissions reported under the Convention on LRTAP.
Date of submission of CLRTAP : 14.02.2022 , received within deadline 15.02.2022
Date of resubmission of CLRTAP : 07.03.2022 , received within deadline 15.03.2022
Parties are invited to check consistency of the format via RepDab (http://www.ceip.at/repdab_howtouse) before the submission of their inventory to the UNECE secretariat, the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and/or the European Commission/European Environment Agency. This section indicates whether the data submitted were in the Nomenclature for Reporting and the files were formatted as requested in the Guidelines for Estimating and Reporting Emission data. The current standard format for reporting is NFR19. Reporting templates can be downloaded from the CEIP website (http://www.ceip.at/reporting_instructions/annexes_to_guidelines).
CLRTAP inventory submitted in format: NFR19 (Version 2019-1) for the years 1980, 1987, 1988 and 1990 to 2020
The tables below lists all sectors where 'Not Estimated (NE)' notation keys were reported for the year 2020. At the end of the table is a statistic of how many notation keys in general were reported per pollutant and a count of not estimated sectors per pollutant. If nothing at all is reported for a certain pollutant which is listed in the tables this is also indicated.
Sector NOx NMVOC SOx NH3 PM2.5 PM10 TSP BC CO Pb Cd Hg As Cr Cu Ni Se Zn DIOX PAH HCB PCB 1A3bi(fu) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3bii(fu) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3biii(fu) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3biv(fu) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3bv(fu) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3bvi(fu) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3bvii(fu) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A4bii NE NE NE 1A4ciii NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A5a NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1B1b NE 2C1 NE NE NE 2C3 NE NE NE NE NE NE 2C5 NE 2C7a NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2C7b NE 2D3c NE NE NE NE NE NE 2D3i NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2G NE NE NE NE NE NE 2H3 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2L NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 3B1b NE 3B4f NE NE NE NE NE NE 3Da2b NE NE 3Dd NE NE NE 5B2 NE 5C2 NE NE NE NE 5D1 NE 5D2 NE 5E NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 11C NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A5c NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 6B NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 33 of 135 Sectors listed Count of overall notation keys 102 85 114 108 91 91 89 110 111 120 114 122 119 115 116 117 119 117 122 117 127 124 Count of 'NE' notation keys 18 15 17 23 20 20 19 20 16 18 18 18 17 16 17 18 17 16 20 12 18 15
The completeness of your data in the WebDab database has been evaluated on the basis of the criteria outlined in the 2014 Guidelines for Reporting Emission Data and Projections under the CLRTAP (ECE/EB.AIR/125):
All numbers in table are as a percentage of the total number of reporting template cells per component and time series. Flagging occurs when the number of cells containing a value or a notation key is less than 80% of the total number of cells, if there are more than 10% zeroes reported, if 'Not Estimated' is reported in cells and/or if the number of values reported is less than 10%. The completeness of CLRTAP NFR Sectors is divided in two sections: 1990 to 1999 and 2000 to 2020.
Component % Value % 0 % NO % NE % NA % IE % C % NR % All NOx 30.1 0.0 25.2 6.8 31.7 5.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 NMVOC 43.7 0.0 25.2 4.0 21.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 SOx 20.3 0.0 25.2 5.8 44.4 4.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 NH3 25.2 0.0 25.0 10.9 35.4 3.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM2.5 41.2 0.0 25.2 6.8 22.5 4.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM10 41.2 0.0 25.2 6.8 22.5 4.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 TSP 42.7 0.0 25.2 6.2 21.5 4.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 BC 24.2 0.0 24.9 7.3 40.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 CO 23.1 0.0 25.2 5.8 43.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 Pb 18.8 0.0 25.2 6.6 46.6 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cd 22.5 0.0 25.2 6.6 42.4 3.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 Hg 16.4 0.0 25.2 6.2 49.7 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 As 18.7 0.0 25.4 6.1 47.1 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cr 21.0 0.0 25.2 5.9 44.7 3.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cu 20.8 0.0 25.2 6.0 44.7 3.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 Ni 19.9 0.0 25.2 6.4 44.7 3.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 Se 18.7 0.0 25.2 6.0 46.8 3.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 Zn 19.4 0.0 25.2 5.9 46.5 3.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 DIOX 17.3 0.0 24.9 6.2 48.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PAH 18.7 0.0 25.9 3.3 48.7 3.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 HCB 12.1 0.0 25.9 7.3 52.4 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PCB 13.3 0.0 25.9 5.7 52.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences
Component % Value % 0 % NO % NE % NA % IE % C % NR % All NOx 29.0 0.0 24.1 7.0 33.8 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NMVOC 43.7 0.0 24.1 4.0 22.1 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 SOx 20.0 0.0 24.1 6.0 44.9 5.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NH3 19.2 0.0 23.7 14.8 38.5 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 CO 22.0 0.0 24.1 6.0 44.8 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Pb 18.3 0.0 24.1 7.0 48.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cd 21.3 0.0 24.1 7.0 43.6 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Hg 15.5 0.0 24.1 8.7 49.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 As 15.5 0.0 24.1 9.5 48.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cr 20.0 0.0 24.1 6.0 46.6 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cu 19.3 0.0 24.1 6.0 46.6 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Ni 18.3 0.0 24.1 7.0 46.6 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Se 18.3 0.0 24.1 6.0 48.5 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Zn 19.3 0.0 24.1 6.0 47.5 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 DIOX 15.0 0.0 23.8 6.3 52.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PAH 15.0 0.0 24.1 3.9 53.8 4.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 HCB 9.3 0.0 24.0 7.0 57.1 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PCB 11.2 0.0 24.1 6.0 57.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences
Component % Value % 0 % NO % NE % NA % IE % C % NR % All NOx 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NMVOC 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 SOx 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NH3 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM2.5 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM10 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 TSP 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 BC 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 CO 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Pb 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cd 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Hg 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 As 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cr 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cu 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Ni 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Se 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Zn 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 DIOX 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PAH 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 HCB 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PCB 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences