Generated by CEIP: 6 th May 2021
This status report was prepared by the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and European Topic Centre on Air and Climate Change (ETC/ACC). The Status Report provides information based on the initial checks of the CLRTAP inventories submitted in accordance with the reporting requirements of the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) and its protocols.
The technical review of national inventories involves the checking and assessment of national data submissions with a view to improving the quality of emission data and associated information.
The annual review process is carried out in three stages in accordance with the review guidelines developed by the Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections (TFEIP) and as agreed upon by EMEP and the Executive Body of CLRTAP in 2007: Methods and procedures for the technical review of air pollutant emission inventories reported under the Convention and its protocols ( ECE/EB.AIR/GE.1/2007/16 ).
§ Stage 1: An initial check of submissions for timeliness and completeness;
§ Stage 2: A synthesis and assessment of all national submissions with respect to consistency and comparability of data with recommendations for data quality improvement;
§ Stage 3: In-depth reviews of selected inventories, by pollutant, country or sector, as in the workplan agreed by the Executive Body.
If you have any comments concerning the results of the tests in this report, please contact the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) by email at ‘emep.emissions@umweltbundesamt.at’
within two weeks of your receiving this Status Report.
STAGE I REVIEW TESTS
This Stage 1 Status Report documents assesses the timeliness, completeness, and format of the submitted national inventories. It presents results of these initial automated tests to countries and supports the subsequent Stage II and Stage III review process. Stage I tests are:
§ 1a Timeliness
§ 1b Format of submission
§ 1c Completeness per sector for 2019 emissions
§ 1d Completeness per pollutant of your data in the WebDab database
Data included in tests:
§ Emissions reported under the Convention on LRTAP.
Date of submission of CLRTAP : 15.02.2021 , received within deadline 15.02.2021
Parties are invited to check consistency of the format via RepDab (http://www.ceip.at/repdab_howtouse) before the submission of their inventory to the UNECE secretariat, the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and/or the European Commission/European Environment Agency. This section indicates whether the data submitted were in the Nomenclature for Reporting and the files were formatted as requested in the Guidelines for Estimating and Reporting Emission data. The current standard format for reporting is NFR19. Reporting templates can be downloaded from the CEIP website (http://www.ceip.at/reporting_instructions/annexes_to_guidelines).
CLRTAP inventory submitted in format: NFR19 (Version 2019-1) for the years 1990 to 2019
The tables below lists all sectors where 'Not Estimated (NE)' notation keys were reported for the year 2019. At the end of the table is a statistic of how many notation keys in general were reported per pollutant and a count of not estimated sectors per pollutant. If nothing at all is reported for a certain pollutant which is listed in the tables this is also indicated.
Sector NOx NMVOC SOx NH3 PM2.5 PM10 TSP BC CO Pb Cd Hg As Cr Cu Ni Se Zn DIOX PAH HCB PCB 1A1c NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3ai(i) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3bi NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3bii NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3biii NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3biv NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3bv NE NE NE NE 1A3di(ii) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3dii NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A5a NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A5b NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1B2av NE 1B2b NE 2A5b NE NE NE 2A5c NE NE NE 2C3 NE NE 2D3b NE 2D3c NE 2D3d NE 2D3e NE 2D3h NE 2D3i NE 2G NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 2H2 NE 2I NE 2J NE NE 3Da1 NE NE NE NE NE 3Da2a NE NE NE 3Da2b NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 3Da2c NE NE 3Da3 NE NE 3Da4 NE 3De NE 3F NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 5B1 NE NE 5C2 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 5D1 NE 5D2 NE 11B NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3ai(ii) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A3di(i) NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1A5c NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 42 of 135 Sectors listed Count of overall notation keys 114 110 128 122 110 110 110 130 123 127 130 131 131 130 130 130 131 130 131 125 135 134 Count of 'NE' notation keys 15 22 15 18 16 17 17 19 13 14 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 18 19 14 17 16
The completeness of your data in the WebDab database has been evaluated on the basis of the criteria outlined in the 2014 Guidelines for Reporting Emission Data and Projections under the CLRTAP (ECE/EB.AIR/125):
All numbers in table are as a percentage of the total number of reporting template cells per component and time series. Flagging occurs when the number of cells containing a value or a notation key is less than 80% of the total number of cells, if there are more than 10% zeroes reported, if 'Not Estimated' is reported in cells and/or if the number of values reported is less than 10%. The completeness of CLRTAP NFR Sectors is divided in two sections: 1990 to 1999 and 2000 to 2019.
Component % Value % 0 % NO % NE % NA % IE % C % NR % All NOx 21.8 0.1 40.5 8.1 22.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 NMVOC 24.9 0.1 35.0 13.1 19.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 SOx 9.7 0.0 39.0 8.1 37.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 NH3 15.8 0.0 42.5 9.1 23.9 9.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM2.5 25.4 0.0 44.9 8.1 13.9 7.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM10 25.4 0.0 44.0 9.1 13.9 7.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 TSP 25.4 0.0 44.0 9.1 13.9 7.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 BC 9.3 0.0 36.9 11.6 35.5 6.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 CO 14.8 0.0 40.4 6.1 34.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 Pb 11.4 0.0 40.5 7.6 35.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cd 9.2 0.0 40.5 10.1 35.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 Hg 8.2 0.0 40.5 10.6 35.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 As 8.2 0.0 41.5 10.6 35.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cr 9.2 0.0 40.5 10.1 35.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cu 9.2 0.0 40.5 10.1 35.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 Ni 9.2 0.0 39.5 9.1 36.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 Se 8.8 0.0 37.5 9.1 39.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 Zn 9.2 0.0 35.5 10.1 39.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 DIOX 8.2 0.0 40.5 11.6 35.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 PAH 13.2 0.0 37.5 7.0 37.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 HCB 6.0 0.0 40.1 9.1 38.9 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PCB 6.6 0.0 37.1 8.1 42.8 6.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences
Component % Value % 0 % NO % NE % NA % IE % C % NR % All NOx 20.4 0.1 37.8 8.0 24.2 9.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NMVOC 23.3 0.1 33.4 13.8 20.6 9.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 SOx 8.4 0.0 36.9 8.0 39.0 8.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 NH3 15.0 0.0 39.7 9.0 26.3 10.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 CO 13.4 0.0 37.7 5.8 36.4 6.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 Pb 9.4 0.0 37.6 8.0 37.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cd 8.4 0.0 37.5 10.0 37.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 Hg 6.4 0.0 37.7 11.0 37.5 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 As 6.4 0.0 38.6 11.0 37.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cr 8.4 0.0 37.3 10.0 37.8 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cu 8.4 0.0 37.3 10.0 37.8 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 Ni 8.4 0.0 36.7 9.1 38.5 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 Se 7.4 0.0 34.2 9.1 42.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 Zn 8.4 0.0 32.4 10.0 41.8 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 DIOX 6.4 0.0 37.5 12.0 37.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 PAH 12.4 0.0 34.3 7.0 39.8 6.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 HCB 5.4 0.0 37.1 8.8 42.1 6.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 PCB 6.0 0.0 34.5 7.9 45.6 6.6 0.0 0.0 100.0
"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences
Component % Value % 0 % NO % NE % NA % IE % C % NR % All NOx 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NMVOC 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 SOx 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NH3 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM2.5 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PM10 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 TSP 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 BC 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 CO 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Pb 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cd 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Hg 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 As 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cr 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Cu 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Ni 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Se 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Zn 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 DIOX 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PAH 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 HCB 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PCB 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences