Technical Annual Status Report (Stage I) of CLRTAP Inventory Review for the Republic of Moldova

Generated by CEIP: 17 th November 2022

This status report was prepared by the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP). The Status Report provides information based on the initial checks of the CLRTAP inventories submitted in accordance with the reporting requirements of the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) and its protocols.


Review Process

The technical review of national inventories involves the checking and assessment of national data submissions with a view to improving the quality of emission data and associated information.

The annual review process is carried out in three stages in accordance with the review guidelines developed by the Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections (TFEIP) and as agreed upon by EMEP and the Executive Body of CLRTAP in 2007: Methods and procedures for the technical review of air pollutant emission inventories reported under the Convention and its protocols ( ECE/EB.AIR/GE.1/2007/16 ).

§ Stage 1: An initial check of submissions for timeliness and completeness;

§ Stage 2: A synthesis and assessment of all national submissions with respect to consistency and comparability of data with recommendations for data quality improvement;

§ Stage 3: In-depth reviews of selected inventories, by pollutant, country or sector, as in the workplan agreed by the Executive Body.

If you have any comments concerning the results of the tests in this report, please contact the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) by email at ‘emep.emissions@umweltbundesamt.at
within two weeks of your receiving this Status Report.


STAGE I REVIEW TESTS

This Stage 1 Status Report documents assesses the timeliness, completeness, and format of the submitted national inventories. It presents results of these initial automated tests to countries and supports the subsequent Stage II and Stage III review process. Stage I tests are:

§ 1a Timeliness

§ 1b Format of submission

§ 1c Completeness per sector for 2020 emissions

§ 1d Completeness per pollutant of your data in the WebDab database

Data included in tests:

§ Emissions reported under the Convention on LRTAP.


1a TIMELINESS

Date of submission of CLRTAP : 10.10.2022 , received after deadline 15.02.2022


1b FORMAT OF SUBMISSION

Parties are invited to check consistency of the format via RepDab (http://www.ceip.at/repdab_howtouse) before the submission of their inventory to the UNECE secretariat, the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and/or the European Commission/European Environment Agency. This section indicates whether the data submitted were in the Nomenclature for Reporting and the files were formatted as requested in the Guidelines for Estimating and Reporting Emission data. The current standard format for reporting is NFR19. Reporting templates can be downloaded from the CEIP website (http://www.ceip.at/reporting_instructions/annexes_to_guidelines).

CLRTAP inventory submitted in format: NFR19 (Version 2014-2) for the years 1990 to 2020


1c COMPLETENESS PER SECTOR (YEAR 2020)

The tables below lists all sectors where 'Not Estimated (NE)' notation keys were reported for the year 2020. At the end of the table is a statistic of how many notation keys in general were reported per pollutant and a count of not estimated sectors per pollutant. If nothing at all is reported for a certain pollutant which is listed in the tables this is also indicated.


CLRTAP (Completeness per sector for 2020):

SectorNOxNMVOCSOxNH3PM2.5PM10TSPBCCOPbCdHgAsCrCuNiSeZnDIOXPAHHCBPCB
                       
1A1a   NE                  
1A1bNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A1cNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A3ai(i)   NE     NENENENENENENENENENENE  
1A3aii(i)   NENENENENE NENENENENENENENENENENE  
1A3bi                  NE NENE
1A3bii                  NE NENE
1A3biii                  NE NENE
1A3bvNE NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A3bviNENENENE   NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A3bviiNENENENE   NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A3c  NE      NE NENE     NE   
1A3dii   NE                  
1A3ei   NE                  
1A4cii         NE NENE     NE   
1A5a   NE                  
1A5bNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1B2ai  NE               NE   
1B2av  NE               NE   
1B2b  NE               NE   
2A1NENENENE    NENENENENENENENENENENENENE 
2A2NENENE     NENENENE          
2A3NENENENE    NE         NENE  
2B10aNE NENENENE NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
2C1   NE            NE   NE 
2D3a    NE                 
2D3bNE NE     NE         NENENE 
2D3cNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
2D3e    NE                 
2D3f    NE                 
2D3gNE NENENENE NENENE NE  NE  NENE NENE
2D3h    NE  NE              
2D3iNE NENE   NENENENENENENENENENENENE   
2G  NE      NE NENENE  NE   NENE
2H2    NE NENE              
3DbNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
3DdNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
3DfNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
3F                    NENE
5ANE NE    NE NENE NENENENENENENENENENE
5B1NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
5B2NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
5C1biii   NENENE          NENE    
5C1bvNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
5C1bviNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
5C2   NE       NE   NE    NE 
5D1 NE  NENENENE NENENENENENENENENE    
5D2   NENENENENE NENENENENENENENENE    
5ENENENE    NENE      NENENE NENENE
                       
1A3ai(ii)   NE     NENENENENENENENENENENE  
1A3aii(ii)NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE  
                       
51 of 135 Sectors listed                      
Count of overall notation keys917810999848381106107111107112110108108109111110114110121120
Count of 'NE' notation keys24192931241917252329252927252526282733242723


1d COMPLETENESS PER POLLUTANT (entire time series)

The completeness of your data in the WebDab database has been evaluated on the basis of the criteria outlined in the 2014 Guidelines for Reporting Emission Data and Projections under the CLRTAP (ECE/EB.AIR/125):

All numbers in table are as a percentage of the total number of reporting template cells per component and time series. Flagging occurs when the number of cells containing a value or a notation key is less than 80% of the total number of cells, if there are more than 10% zeroes reported, if 'Not Estimated' is reported in cells and/or if the number of values reported is less than 10%. The completeness of CLRTAP NFR Sectors is divided in two sections: 1990 to 1999 and 2000 to 2020.


CLRTAP (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 2000 to 2020 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx34.51.828.216.915.13.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC44.01.728.212.310.33.00.00.0100.0
SOx19.51.429.819.426.93.00.00.0100.0
NH326.53.928.220.117.73.00.00.0100.0
PM2.539.41.428.216.411.33.00.00.0100.0
PM1040.31.428.212.314.43.00.00.0100.0
TSP42.01.428.210.414.43.00.00.0100.0
BC20.92.029.017.028.03.00.00.0100.0
CO20.80.729.015.331.03.00.00.0100.0
Pb18.11.429.019.828.33.00.00.0100.0
Cd21.91.029.016.928.23.00.00.0100.0
Hg17.11.429.019.829.33.00.00.0100.0
As19.11.429.017.329.83.00.00.0100.0
Cr20.91.029.016.329.73.00.00.0100.0
Cu21.00.929.016.329.73.00.00.0100.0
Ni20.10.929.017.129.73.00.00.0100.0
Se18.90.929.018.329.73.00.00.0100.0
Zn19.40.929.017.429.73.00.00.0100.0
DIOX14.21.929.021.929.23.00.00.0100.0
PAH19.00.829.016.931.03.00.00.0100.0
HCB8.33.329.020.035.43.00.00.0100.0
PCB8.83.329.017.138.53.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


CLRTAP (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 1990 to 1999 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx32.53.827.916.116.13.10.00.0100.0
NMVOC40.24.828.012.011.33.00.00.0100.0
SOx17.43.729.819.127.03.00.00.0100.0
NH325.34.828.020.018.23.00.00.0100.0
CO19.21.828.814.032.23.00.00.0100.0
Pb16.23.728.818.429.63.00.00.0100.0
Cd20.12.728.816.129.13.00.00.0100.0
Hg15.33.728.818.430.73.00.00.0100.0
As17.13.728.817.130.13.00.00.0100.0
Cr19.22.728.815.930.23.00.00.0100.0
Cu19.22.728.815.330.73.00.00.0100.0
Ni18.32.728.816.930.23.00.00.0100.0
Se17.12.728.817.930.23.00.00.0100.0
Zn17.32.728.816.930.73.00.00.0100.0
DIOX12.23.828.820.330.83.00.00.0100.0
PAH18.31.828.815.731.53.00.00.0100.0
HCB7.73.828.819.137.03.00.00.0100.0
PCB8.53.828.816.339.43.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


CLRTAP (Completeness of National Totals from 1990 to 2020 including NFR and SNAP):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
SOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NH3100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PM2.5100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PM10100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
TSP100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
BC100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
CO100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Pb100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Cd100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Hg100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
As100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Cr100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Cu100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Ni100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Se100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Zn100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
DIOX100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PAH100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
HCB100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PCB100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences