Technical Annual Status Report (Stage I) of CLRTAP Inventory Review for Georgia

Generated by CEIP: 19 th April 2018

This status report was prepared by the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and European Topic Centre on Air and Climate Change (ETC/ACC). The Status Report provides information based on the initial checks of the CLRTAP inventories submitted in accordance with the reporting requirements of the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) and its protocols.


Review Process

The technical review of national inventories involves the checking and assessment of national data submissions with a view to improving the quality of emission data and associated information.

The annual review process is carried out in three stages in accordance with the review guidelines developed by the Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections (TFEIP) and as agreed upon by EMEP and the Executive Body of CLRTAP in 2007: Methods and procedures for the technical review of air pollutant emission inventories reported under the Convention and its protocols ( ECE/EB.AIR/GE.1/2007/16 ).

§ Stage 1: An initial check of submissions for timeliness and completeness;

§ Stage 2: A synthesis and assessment of all national submissions with respect to consistency and comparability of data with recommendations for data quality improvement;

§ Stage 3: In-depth reviews of selected inventories, by pollutant, country or sector, as in the workplan agreed by the Executive Body.

If you have any comments concerning the results of the tests in this report, please contact the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) by email at ‘emep.emissions@umweltbundesamt.at
within two weeks of your receiving this Status Report.


STAGE I REVIEW TESTS

This Stage 1 Status Report documents assesses the timeliness, completeness, and format of the submitted national inventories. It presents results of these initial automated tests to countries and supports the subsequent Stage II and Stage III review process. Stage I tests are:

§ 1a Timeliness

§ 1b Format of submission

§ 1c Completeness per sector for 2016 emissions

§ 1d Completeness per pollutant of your data in the WebDab database

Data included in tests:

§ Emissions reported under the Convention on LRTAP.


1a TIMELINESS

Date of submission of CLRTAP : 14.2.2018 , received within deadline 15.02.2018

Date of resubmission of CLRTAP : 29.3.2018 , received after deadline 15.03.2018


1b FORMAT OF SUBMISSION

Parties are invited to check consistency of the format via RepDab (http://www.ceip.at/repdab_howtouse) before the submission of their inventory to the UNECE secretariat, the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and/or the European Commission/European Environment Agency. This section indicates whether the data submitted were in the Nomenclature for Reporting and the files were formatted as requested in the Guidelines for Estimating and Reporting Emission data. The current standard format for reporting is NFR14. Reporting templates can be downloaded from the CEIP website (http://www.ceip.at/reporting_instructions/annexes_to_guidelines).

CLRTAP inventory submitted in format: NFR14 (Version 2014-1) for the years 2007 to 2016


1c COMPLETENESS PER SECTOR (YEAR 2016)

The tables below lists all sectors where 'Not Estimated (NE)' notation keys were reported for the year 2016. At the end of the table is a statistic of how many notation keys in general were reported per pollutant and a count of not estimated sectors per pollutant. If nothing at all is reported for a certain pollutant which is listed in the tables this is also indicated.


CLRTAP (Completeness per sector for 2016):

SectorNOxNMVOCSOxNH3PM2.5PM10TSPBCCOPbCdHgAsCrCuNiSeZnDIOXPAHHCBPCB
                       
1A1a   NE              NE NENE
1A2a   NE                  
1A2b   NE                  
1A2c NE  NENE NE NENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A2d   NE                NENE
1A3ai(i)NENENE NENENENENE             
1A3aii(i)NENENE NENENENENE             
1A3bi       NE   NENE       NENE
1A3bii       NE   NENE       NENE
1A3biii       NE   NENE       NENE
1A3biv       NE   NENE       NENE
1A3bv                  NE NENE
1A3bvi      NE    NENE      NENENE
1A3bvii    NENENE  NENENENENENENENENE NENENE
1A3c       NE NE NENE     NENE  
1A3dii  NE    NE NENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A3eiNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A4aiiNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A4biiNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A4cii       NE   NENE     NENENENE
1A4ciiiNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1B1a NE       NENENENENENENENENE    
1B1b NE NE     NENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1B2ai    NENE NE          NE   
1B2aiv NE                    
1B2av NE                    
1B2b  NE               NE   
1B2cNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
2A5b    NENENE               
2A6    NENE                
2B10a NE  NENE                
2C3NENENENE    NENENENENENENENENENE NE  
2C5 NE NE   NENE    NENENENE  NENE 
2D3cNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
2D3d NE                    
2D3e NE                    
2D3f NE                    
2D3g NE                    
2D3h NE                    
2H2    NENE                
2I    NENE                
3B4eNENE NENENENE               
3B4fNENE NENENENE               
3B4giiiNENE NENENENE               
3Da1      NE               
3De NE NE                  
3Df                    NE 
3FNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
5A   NENENENE NE  NE          
5B1NENENENENENENENENE             
5C1aNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
5C1bi NE NE     NENE NENENENENENENENENENE
5C1biiNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
5C1biii   NENENE          NENENENENENE
5C1bivNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
5C2NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE 
5D1    NENENE  NENENENENENENENENE    
5D2    NENENE  NENENENENENENENENE    
5ENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
                       
                       
59 of 136 NFR14 Sectors listed                      
Count of overall notation keys9591102108939389108102109108113115110110109110110113114119118
Count of 'NE' notation keys19331827303025251822212828222222232223232926


1d COMPLETENESS PER POLLUTANT (entire time series)

The completeness of your data in the WebDab database has been evaluated on the basis of the criteria outlined in the 2014 Guidelines for Reporting Emission Data and Projections under the CLRTAP (ECE/EB.AIR/125):

All numbers in table are as a percentage of the total number of reporting template cells per component and time series. Flagging occurs when the number of cells containing a value or a notation key is less than 80% of the total number of cells, if there are more than 10% zeroes reported, if 'Not Estimated' is reported in cells and/or if the number of values reported is less than 10%. The completeness of CLRTAP NFR Sectors is divided in two sections: 1990 to 1999 and 2000 to 2016.


CLRTAP (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 2000 to 2016 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx11.00.011.011.134.44.50.00.071.6
NMVOC13.20.010.517.122.64.00.00.067.3
SOx7.40.611.210.437.33.50.00.170.3
NH36.20.012.815.532.30.60.00.068.0
PM2.510.60.010.420.522.21.30.00.065.2
PM1010.60.010.420.522.21.30.00.065.2
TSP13.20.010.115.122.24.50.00.065.2
BC4.40.010.414.425.80.20.00.055.3
CO8.00.010.910.639.93.30.00.072.8
Pb3.90.611.714.745.50.20.00.076.6
Cd4.50.011.714.548.70.20.00.079.8
Hg2.40.011.717.844.80.20.00.076.9
As1.90.011.817.041.70.20.00.072.7
Cr4.40.011.714.641.80.20.00.072.7
Cu4.30.011.814.841.80.20.00.072.7
Ni4.50.011.714.641.80.20.00.072.7
Se4.50.011.714.641.80.20.00.072.7
Zn4.50.011.714.142.40.20.00.072.7
DIOX3.40.011.615.041.40.20.00.071.7
PAH3.40.011.714.344.30.20.00.073.8
HCB1.40.011.615.459.60.20.00.088.4
PCB2.00.011.214.563.70.20.00.091.6

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


CLRTAP (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 1990 to 1999 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
NMVOC0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
SOx0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
NH30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
CO0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Pb0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Cd0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Hg0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
As0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Cr0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Cu0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Ni0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Se0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Zn0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
DIOX0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
PAH0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
HCB0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
PCB0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


CLRTAP (Completeness of National Totals from 1990 to 2016 including NFR and SNAP):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
SOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NH363.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.063.0
PM2.558.80.00.00.00.00.00.00.058.8
PM1058.80.00.00.00.00.00.00.058.8
TSP100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
BC58.80.00.00.00.00.00.00.058.8
CO100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Pb37.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.037.0
Cd37.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.037.0
Hg37.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.037.0
As14.822.20.00.00.00.00.00.037.0
Cr37.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.037.0
Cu37.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.037.0
Ni37.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.037.0
Se37.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.037.0
Zn37.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.037.0
DIOX55.60.00.07.40.00.00.00.063.0
PAH63.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.063.0
HCB14.822.20.00.025.90.00.00.063.0
PCB37.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.037.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences