Technical Annual Status Report (Stage I) of CLRTAP and NECD Inventory Review for Cyprus

Generated by CEIP: 19 th April 2018

This status report was prepared by the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and European Topic Centre on Air and Climate Change (ETC/ACC). The Status Report provides information based on the initial checks of the CLRTAP and NECD inventories submitted in accordance with the reporting requirements of the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) and its protocols, and for EU Member States the Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants (NECD).


Review Process

The technical review of national inventories involves the checking and assessment of national data submissions with a view to improving the quality of emission data and associated information.

The annual review process is carried out in three stages in accordance with the review guidelines developed by the Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections (TFEIP) and as agreed upon by EMEP and the Executive Body of CLRTAP in 2007: Methods and procedures for the technical review of air pollutant emission inventories reported under the Convention and its protocols ( ECE/EB.AIR/GE.1/2007/16 ).

§ Stage 1: An initial check of submissions for timeliness and completeness;

§ Stage 2: A synthesis and assessment of all national submissions with respect to consistency and comparability of data with recommendations for data quality improvement;

§ Stage 3: In-depth reviews of selected inventories, by pollutant, country or sector, as in the workplan agreed by the Executive Body.

If you have any comments concerning the results of the tests in this report, please contact the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) by email at ‘emep.emissions@umweltbundesamt.at
within two weeks of your receiving this Status Report.


STAGE I REVIEW TESTS

This Stage 1 Status Report documents assesses the timeliness, completeness, and format of the submitted national inventories. It presents results of these initial automated tests to countries and supports the subsequent Stage II and Stage III review process. Stage I tests are:

§ 1a Timeliness

§ 1b Format of submission

§ 1c Completeness per sector for 2016 emissions

§ 1d Completeness per pollutant of your data in the WebDab database

Data included in tests:

§ Emissions reported under the Convention on LRTAP.

§ Emissions reported under the NECD Directive to the European Commission and European Environment Agency.


1a TIMELINESS

Date of submission of NECD : 15.2.2018 , received within deadline 15.02.2018

Date of submission of CLRTAP : 15.2.2018 , received within deadline 15.02.2018


1b FORMAT OF SUBMISSION

Parties are invited to check consistency of the format via RepDab (http://www.ceip.at/repdab_howtouse) before the submission of their inventory to the UNECE secretariat, the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP) and/or the European Commission/European Environment Agency. This section indicates whether the data submitted were in the Nomenclature for Reporting and the files were formatted as requested in the Guidelines for Estimating and Reporting Emission data. The current standard format for reporting is NFR14. Reporting templates can be downloaded from the CEIP website (http://www.ceip.at/reporting_instructions/annexes_to_guidelines).

NECD inventory submitted in format: NFR14 (Version 2014-2) for the years 1990 to 2016

CLRTAP inventory submitted in format: NFR14 (Version 2014-2) for the years 1990 to 2016


1c COMPLETENESS PER SECTOR (YEAR 2016)

The tables below lists all sectors where 'Not Estimated (NE)' notation keys were reported for the year 2016. At the end of the table is a statistic of how many notation keys in general were reported per pollutant and a count of not estimated sectors per pollutant. If nothing at all is reported for a certain pollutant which is listed in the tables this is also indicated. For NECD you can see the sector completeness not only for 2016, but also for 2010 and 2005 emission data.


CLRTAP (Completeness per sector for 2016):

SectorNOxNMVOCSOxNH3PM2.5PM10TSPBCCOPbCdHgAsCrCuNiSeZnDIOXPAHHCBPCB
                       
1A1a   NE                  
1A2b   NE                NENE
1A2d   NE                NENE
1A2gvii         NE NENE     NE   
1A3ai(i)   NE     NENENENENENENENENENENE  
1A3aii(i)   NE     NENENENENENENENENENENE  
1A3bi           NENE         
1A3bii           NENE         
1A3biii           NENE         
1A3biv           NENE         
1A3bv                 NENE  NE
1A3bvi        NE         NENE NE
1A3bvii        NENENENENENENENENE NENE NE
1A3dii   NE    NENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A4ci   NE                NENE
1A4cii         NE NENE     NE   
1A4ciii   NE    NENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A5b   NE    NENENENENENENENENENENENENE 
1B2av  NE               NE   
2A1   NE    NENENENENENENENENENENENENE 
2A2        NENENENE          
2A5b NE                    
2D3a    NENENE               
2D3bNE NE     NE         NENENE 
2D3cNE        NENENE      NENENE 
2D3f    NENENE               
2D3gNE NENENENENE NENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
2D3h    NENENE               
2G                NE   NENE
2H2    NENENE               
3Da2aNENENE NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
3Da2b NENE NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
3Da2cNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
3Da3NENENE NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
3Da4NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
3DbNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
3De   NE                  
3F                    NENE
5A   NE    NE  NE          
5B1NENENE NENENENENE             
5C1bvNENENENE   NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
5C2   NE       NE   NE    NE 
5D1   NENENENE  NENENENENENENENENE    
5ENENENENE   NENE      NENENE NENENE
                       
11BNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
11CNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A3ai(ii)NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A3aii(ii)   NE   NE NENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A3di(i)   NE   NENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
1A5cNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
6BNENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENENE
                       
51 of 136 NFR14 Sectors listed                      
Count of overall notation keys9887110109878787113113117115122121115115117117116118117126126
Count of 'NE' notation keys16151727181818162527253329232325252429262826


NECD (Completeness per sector for 2016, 2010 and 2005):

2016

SectorNOxNMVOCSOxNH3
     
1A1a   NE
1A2b   NE
1A2d   NE
1A3ai(i)   NE
1A3aii(i)   NE
1A3dii   NE
1A4ci   NE
1A4ciii   NE
1A5b   NE
1B2av  NE 
2A1   NE
2A5b NE  
2D3bNE NE 
2D3cNE   
2D3gNE NENE
3Da2aNENENE 
3Da2b NENE 
3Da2cNENENENE
3Da3NENENE 
3Da4NENENENE
3DbNENENENE
3De   NE
5A   NE
5B1NENENE 
5C1bvNENENENE
5C2   NE
5D1   NE
5ENENENENE
     
11BNENENENE
11CNENENENE
1A3ai(ii)NENENENE
1A3aii(ii)   NE
1A3di(i)   NE
1A5cNENENENE
6BNENENENE
     
35 of 136 NFR14 Sectors listed    
Count of overall notation keys9887110109
Count of 'NE' notation keys16151727

2010

SectorNOxNMVOCSOxNH3
     
1A1a   NE
1A2a   NE
1A2b   NE
1A2d   NE
1A3ai(i)   NE
1A3aii(i)   NE
1A3dii   NE
1A4ci   NE
1A4ciii   NE
1A5b   NE
1B2av  NE 
2A1   NE
2A5b NE  
2D3bNE NE 
2D3cNE   
2D3gNE NENE
3Da2aNENENE 
3Da2b NENE 
3Da2cNENENENE
3Da3NENENE 
3Da4NENENENE
3DbNENENENE
3De   NE
5A   NE
5B1NENENE 
5C1bvNENENENE
5C2   NE
5D1   NE
5ENENENENE
     
11BNENENENE
11CNENENENE
1A3ai(ii)NENENENE
1A3aii(ii)   NE
1A3di(i)   NE
1A5cNENENENE
6BNENENENE
     
36 of 136 NFR14 Sectors listed    
Count of overall notation keys9786109109
Count of 'NE' notation keys16151728

2005

SectorNOxNMVOCSOxNH3
     
1A1a   NE
1A2a   NE
1A2b   NE
1A2d   NE
1A3ai(i)   NE
1A3aii(i)   NE
1A3dii   NE
1A4ci   NE
1A4ciii   NE
1A5b   NE
1B2av  NE 
2A1   NE
2A5b NE  
2C1NE NENE
2D3bNE NE 
2D3cNE   
2D3gNE NENE
3Da2aNENENE 
3Da2b NENE 
3Da2cNENENENE
3Da3NENENE 
3Da4NENENENE
3DbNENENENE
3De   NE
5A   NE
5C1bvNENENENE
5C2   NE
5D1   NE
5ENENENENE
     
11BNENENENE
11CNENENENE
1A3ai(ii)NENENENE
1A3aii(ii)   NE
1A3di(i)   NE
1A5cNENENENE
6BNENENENE
     
36 of 136 NFR14 Sectors listed    
Count of overall notation keys9684109109
Count of 'NE' notation keys16141729


1d COMPLETENESS PER POLLUTANT (entire time series)

The completeness of your data in the WebDab database has been evaluated on the basis of the criteria outlined in the 2014 Guidelines for Reporting Emission Data and Projections under the CLRTAP (ECE/EB.AIR/125):

All numbers in table are as a percentage of the total number of reporting template cells per component and time series. Flagging occurs when the number of cells containing a value or a notation key is less than 80% of the total number of cells, if there are more than 10% zeroes reported, if 'Not Estimated' is reported in cells and/or if the number of values reported is less than 10%. The completeness of CLRTAP NFR Sectors is divided in two sections: 1990 to 1999 and 2000 to 2016.


CLRTAP (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 2000 to 2016 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx29.50.041.411.413.05.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC38.10.041.410.05.05.00.00.0100.0
SOx20.00.041.412.121.05.00.00.0100.0
NH319.60.040.620.915.24.00.00.0100.0
PM2.537.60.041.412.94.34.00.00.0100.0
PM1037.60.041.412.94.34.00.00.0100.0
TSP37.60.041.412.74.34.00.00.0100.0
BC18.30.041.410.425.84.00.00.0100.0
CO17.90.341.418.119.04.00.00.0100.0
Pb15.10.041.419.619.94.00.00.0100.0
Cd16.60.041.418.619.94.00.00.0100.0
Hg11.30.041.424.619.04.00.00.0100.0
As12.10.041.421.621.04.00.00.0100.0
Cr16.60.041.416.921.04.00.00.0100.0
Cu16.60.041.416.921.04.00.00.0100.0
Ni15.10.041.418.621.04.00.00.0100.0
Se15.10.041.418.821.04.00.00.0100.0
Zn15.70.041.417.821.04.00.00.0100.0
DIOX14.30.041.421.619.04.00.00.0100.0
PAH15.00.041.419.620.94.00.00.0100.0
HCB6.90.041.421.326.64.00.00.0100.0
PCB7.00.041.419.627.94.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


CLRTAP (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 1990 to 1999 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx31.00.039.013.013.05.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC41.00.039.010.05.05.00.00.0100.0
SOx21.00.039.013.021.05.00.00.0100.0
NH319.00.038.024.016.04.00.00.0100.0
CO19.01.039.019.019.04.00.00.0100.0
Pb16.01.039.021.020.04.00.00.0100.0
Cd17.01.039.020.020.04.00.00.0100.0
Hg12.01.039.026.019.04.00.00.0100.0
As13.01.039.023.021.04.00.00.0100.0
Cr17.01.039.019.021.04.00.00.0100.0
Cu17.01.039.019.021.04.00.00.0100.0
Ni16.00.039.020.021.04.00.00.0100.0
Se16.00.039.021.021.04.00.00.0100.0
Zn16.00.039.020.021.04.00.00.0100.0
DIOX16.00.039.023.019.04.00.00.0100.0
PAH16.00.039.021.021.04.00.00.0100.0
HCB7.00.039.023.028.04.00.00.0100.0
PCB7.00.039.021.030.04.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


CLRTAP (Completeness of National Totals from 1990 to 2016 including NFR and SNAP):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
SOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NH3100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PM2.5100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PM10100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
TSP100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
BC100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
CO100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Pb100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Cd100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Hg100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
As100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Cr100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Cu100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Ni100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Se100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
Zn100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
DIOX100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PAH100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
HCB100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PCB100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences



-------------

NECD (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 2000 to 2016 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx29.50.041.411.413.05.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC38.10.041.410.05.05.00.00.0100.0
SOx20.00.041.412.121.05.00.00.0100.0
NH319.60.040.620.915.24.00.00.0100.0
PM2.537.60.041.412.94.34.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


NECD (Completeness of NFR Sectors from 1990 to 1999 without National Totals):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx31.00.039.013.013.05.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC41.00.039.010.05.05.00.00.0100.0
SOx21.00.039.013.021.05.00.00.0100.0
NH319.00.038.024.016.04.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences


NECD (Completeness of National Totals from 1990 to 2016):

Component% Value% 0% NO% NE% NA% IE% C% NR% All
NOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NMVOC100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
SOx100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
NH3100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0
PM2.5100.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0100.0

"Value" – the cell contains a number > 0.005;
"0" – the cell contains 0 or a number < 0.005;
"NO", "NE", "NA", "IE", "C" and "NR" are notation keys as defined in Reporting Guidelines and NFR;
In certain cases the total percentage value may not be exactly the sum of the other columns because of rounding differences